Journal of the Korean Housing Association ISSN:2234-3571(Print) 2234-2257(Online) 한국주거학회논문집

Asia Today (2026. 8. 13.). SH Corporation responds to Guryong Village residents’ claims: Temporary housing since 2017 with deposit waiver and 60% rent reduction. Retrieved from https://www.asiatoday.co.kr/kn/view.php?key=20260813010004787

Bae, S. S., & Lee, S. K. (2009). Income-mixed housing policy in residential space: The U.S. case (KRIHS Policy Brief No. 240). Anyang, Korea: Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.

Barry Farm Tenants and Allies Association v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission, 182 A.3d 1214 (D.C. 2018).

Boonyabancha, S. (2005). Baan Mankong: Going to scale with “slum” and squatter upgrading in Thailand. Environment and Urbanization, 17(1), 21-46.

Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2015). Integrating the inner city: The promise and perils of mixed-income public housing transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Cho, S., Eun, N., & Choi, M. (2025). A study on management strategies in mixed tenure housing complexes for social integration: A case study of Haengbok Housing complex. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 36(5), 25-34.

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1991). General comment No. 4: The right to adequate housing (Art. 11(1)) (UN Doc. E/1992/23). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1997). General comment No. 7: The right to adequate housing (Art. 11(1)): Forced evictions (UN Doc. E/1998/22). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

District of Columbia (2006). Barry Farm, Park Chester, Wade Road community revitalization plan. Washington, DC: Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development.

District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) (2016). Resolution 16-06: To adopt relocation and re-entry policies for New Communities Initiative developments. Washington, DC: Author.

Doshi, S. (2013). The politics of the evicted: Redevelopment, subjectivity, and difference in Mumbai’s slum frontier. Antipode, 45(4), 844-865.

Edaily (2026. 3. 2.). Relocation rate 72%: Guryong Village redevelopment stalled by relocation disputes. Retrieved from https://www.edaily.co.kr/News/Read?mediaCodeNo=257&newsId=02112326645379384

Financial News (2026. 7. 22.). First 2,120 units of the Guryong Village project pass integrated review; construction in 2027. Retrieved from https://www.fnnews.com/news/202607220823180502

Financial News. (2026. 9. 1.). Average new-apartment sale price in the three Gangnam districts reaches KRW 78.42 million per 3.3 m2 in 2026. Retrieved from https://www.fnnews.com/news/202609011814136146

Fletcher, A. A. (2021). Forced betting the farm: How historic preservation law fails poor and nonwhite communities. Georgetown Law Journal, 109(6), 1543-1573.

Gangnam-gu Office (n.d.). Gaepo Guryong Village urban development project: Zone designation and development plan (Seoul Notice, Dec. 8, 2016). Retrieved from https://www.gangnam.go.kr/board/article/2932/view.do?mid=ID01_0501

Goetz, E. G. (2013). New Deal ruins: Race, economic justice, and public housing policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Gu, G., & Kim, S. (2024). Comparative study on perception of residential environment between social-mixed and rent-only housing complex residents. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 35(2), 69-82.

Ha, S.-K. (2001). Substandard settlements and joint redevelopment projects in Seoul. Habitat International, 25(3), 385-397.

Ha, S.-K. (2010). The right to housing and the securing of “adequate housing” as viewed through the Constitution and international human rights norms. Korea Social Policy Review, 17(1), 321-351.

Herald Corp. (2020. 6. 16.). Guryong Village: 580 landowners and 90% private land as expropriation begins. Retrieved from https://biz.heraldcorp.com/article/2338991

HOPE SF. (2021). The story of now: HOPE SF 2021. San Francisco, CA: Author.

Hunters View Community Partners (2008). Hunters View design for development. San Francisco, CA: Author.

Jeong, J. W., & Koo, J. H. (2024). Comparative analysis of important factors in relocation strategies for informal settlements occupying public lands between experts and residents. Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 22(1), 159-170.

Jin, E.-A., & Lee, W.-J. (2018). The effect of resident participation in urban regeneration on social capital: Focused on the ‘Amichojang’ area in Busan. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 29(5), 77-88.

Joo, K. S. (2007). A critical review of inhabitant relocation policy theory. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, 20(2), 199-208.

Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 369-409.

Jung, Y., Moon, S., & An, J. (2026). Ensuring housing rights for semi-basement residents in the climate crisis: A qualitative case study of Pyeongtaek City. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 37(3), 1-10.

Kim, J. S., Kim, M. G., Cheon, J. E., & Lee, S. W. (2017). An analysis of formation process of development policy of Guryong Village based on multiple streams model. Public Policy Review, 31(1), 127-155.

Kim, J.-P. (2010). Specific meaning of requisites and criteria of selecting the subjects constituted as recipient of move measures. Studies on Public Administration Cases, 15(1), 409-464.

Kim, M.-H., & Noh, S.-H. (2011). A study on social exclusion of residents living in ‘Da-Ka-Gu’ rental housing and permanent rental apartments. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 22(5), 91-100.

Kim, Y. D., Kang, H. C., & Lim, S. E. (2014). Exploring interests in inter-governmental conflict over development methods in Guryong Village. Space and Society, 24(2), 220-251.

Kim, Y. O., Shin, H. W., & Kim, M. S. (2015). The typology and characteristics of shanty towns according to the formation and the change in Seoul. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea, 16(5), 45-57.

Kyunghyang Shinmun (2023. 3. 30.). Compensation for Guryong Village to begin in May; 1,107 households recognized as of the 2015 base date. Retrieved from https://www.khan.co.kr/economy/real_estate/article/202303301115001

Kyunghyang Shinmun (2025. 8. 27.). SH completes acquisition of Guryong Village land and structures; 751 of 1,107 households relocated. Retrieved from https://www.khan.co.kr/article/202508270600171

Lee, H.-J., Lee, S.-J., & Lee, Y.-S. (2012). A study on the residents’ recognition of social-mix apartment. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 23(2), 1-14.

Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2014). Perception on social mix of managers and residents in the mixed housing complexes for sale and rental apartment. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 25(6), 27-37.

Lee, Y.-J. (2021). Content analysis of preceding researches on social-mixed housing complex. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 32(3), 71-81.

Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Eds. and Trans.). Oxford, England: Blackwell. (Original work published 1968)

Lim, M.-R. (2025). A study on the birth of Kowloon [Guryong] Village, a space of exception: Focused on the decision not to allow resident registration in new informal settlements. Society and History, 145, 489-518.

MTN (2026. 8. 5.). Guryong Village: 163 households yet to relocate; SH to withdraw suits upon relocation; construction 2027, completion 2031. Retrieved from https://news.mtn.co.kr/news-detail/2026080415521946726

Mukhija, V. (2001). Enabling slum redevelopment in Mumbai: Policy paradox in practice. Housing Studies, 16(6), 791-806.

Nam, W.-S., & Im, D.-H. (2017). Using city land for supplying public rental housing: Can the supply through construction be last in Seoul? Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 28(4), 77-84.

Nam, W.-S., & Lee, G.-I. (2024). Development of rent adjustment factor of integrated public rental housing: Focusing on the case of Seoul. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 35(5), 1-13.

Nam, W.-S., Im, H.-N., & Kim, S. (2022). Regenerating distressed public rental housing estates by extension of separate building: Focusing on case studies of public rental housing estates in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 33(3), 39-52.

Newdaily (2022. 10. 18.). Guryong Village, no groundbreaking after ten years: “Give us sale rights” vs. “Only rental entry rights are possible”. Retrieved from https://biz.newdaily.co.kr/site/data/html/2022/10/18/2022101800043.html

Newdaily (2025. 8. 21.). Baeksa Village redevelopment finalized: 3,178 units, construction in the second half of the year. Retrieved from https://www.newdaily.co.kr/site/data/html/2025/08/21/2025082100035.html

Newsis (2020. 6. 7.). Implementation plan for the Guryong Village urban development project approved. Retrieved from https://www.newsis.com/view/NISX20200607_0001050710

Nijman, J. (2008). Against the odds: Slum rehabilitation in neoliberal Mumbai. Cities, 25(2), 73-85.

Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (DMPED) (2024). Mayor Bowser cuts ribbon on The Asberry, first on-site building delivered at historic Barry Farm-Hillsdale. Retrieved from https://dmped.dc.gov/release/mayor-bowser-cuts-ribbon-asberry-first-site-building-delivered-historic-barry-farm%E2%80%93hillsdale

Overland, Pacific & Cutler (2008). Hunters View relocation plan. San Francisco, CA: Author.

Park, K.-W. (2023). Concept of livelihood measures, and its legal nature, method of litigation. Public Law, 52(1), 369-393.

Park, S. W. (2022). POSCO E&C Gang-nam Guryong Village development case study. Real Estate and Urban Studies, 15(1), 109-125.

Payne, G. (2001). Urban land tenure policy options: Titles or rights? Habitat International, 25(3), 415-429.

Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M. K., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. A. (2004). A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: Urban Institute and Brookings Institution.

Preservation of Affordable Housing (POAH) (2025). $98.5 million financing closes for 3rd new property in Barry Farm redevelopment. Retrieved from https://www.poah.org/news/985-million-financing-closes-3rd-new-property-barry-farm-redevelopment

Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.

Rhee, J.-S. (2016). A study of housing welfare regulations of city & province. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 27(6), 77-84.

San Francisco Examiner (2017. 7. 30.). HOPE SF focuses on public housing development without displacement. Retrieved from https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/hope-sf-focuses-on-public-housing-development-without-displacement/article_38dc15bb-61d7-5fa2-8248-dfcba76752b1.html

San Francisco Mayor’s Office (2026). Mayor Lurie celebrates grand opening of Hunters View Phase III, delivering 118 affordable homes near India Basin. Retrieved from https://www.sf.gov/news-mayor-lurie-celebrates-grand-opening-of-hunters-view-phase-iii-delivering-118-affordable-homes-near-india-basin

San Francisco Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) (2021). Hunters View Phase III infrastructure gap financing loan evaluation (Loan Committee, July 2, 2021). San Francisco, CA: Author.

Seo, B. (2014). Social cohesion of public rental housing residents in Seoul: Community activities and cultural influences. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 25(2), 45-54.

Seoul Metropolitan Government (2014). Guryong Village urban development zone designation lapses. Retrieved from https://news.seoul.go.kr/citybuild/archives/34733

SeoulShinmun. (2025. 12. 12.). Guryong Village development plan revised to 3,739 units: 1,691 long-term public lease, 1,107 integrated public rental, 941 for sale. Retrieved from https://www.seoul.co.kr/news/economy/estate/2025/12/12/20251212014007

Shin, H. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2016). The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul. Urban Studies, 53(3), 540-559.

Sisa Journal-e (2024. 11. 25.). Guryong Village land compensation to reach about KRW 1.1 trillion as expropriation proceeds. Retrieved from https://www.sisajournal-e.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=407534

Song, J. Q. (2012). Formation and conflict in community of urban poor village: “Danger community” and “right to the residence” in Guryong-mauel. Studies in Urban Humanities, 4(2), 63-90.

Street Sense (2021. 7. 14.). Residents and officials question whether the Barry Farm right to return is enforceable. Retrieved from https://streetsensemedia.org/article/poah-redevelopment-dc-housing-authority/

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (2014). Hunters View: Transforming public housing in San Francisco (PD&R Edge, Jan. 27, 2014). Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_inpractice_012714.html

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (2015). HOPE VI data compilation and analysis. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research.

[Exclusion of tenants from relocation measures under Article 40(3) of the Enforcement Decree of the Land Compensation Act], 2004Hun-Ma19 (Constitutional Court of Korea February 23, 2006).

[Legal nature of relocation measures], 92Da35783 (en banc) (Supreme Court of Korea May 24, 1994).